Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Darnell v. Swan et al
as 6:2026cv00478
Petitioner:
Sherman L Darnell
Respondent:
Pamela Swan, Crystal Conklin, Brandi Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00421
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lackey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Norman v. Jones et al
as 1:2026cv01830
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gibril Norman
Defendant:
Tamika L Jones, Susan Madsen, Christopher Chessnoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lackey v. Nationwide Private Client
as 5:2026cv02840
Plaintiff:
Chris Lackey
Defendant:
Nationwide Private Client and On Your Side Nationwide Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Lackey v. USA
as 5:2026cv00099
Petitioner:
Lester Diontae Lackey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LACKEY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 2:2026cv02545
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. and AMTRAK
Plaintiff:
THELMA LACKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
David Graham Grice v. Linda Ford
as 26-1405
Defendant:
LINDA B. FORD, Agent for Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES and GERALD F. LACKEY, Agent for the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Vehicles
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRAHAM GRICE
Lackey v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
as 0:2026cv02128
Plaintiff:
Betty Lackey
Defendant:
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gilley v. Victoria County Jail
as 6:2026cv00021
Plaintiff:
Steve Gilley
Defendant:
Victoria County Jail, Deputy Thompson, Deputy West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
