Cases 1 - 10 of 6,109
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Laurie Joy Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Callahan v. Levasseur et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Ryan Callahan
Defendant:
C/O Levasseur, Jeff Laurie, C/O Giorgi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metz v. McCarthy
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Metz
Defendant:
Laurie McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Thomas v. Sanders County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Karl Thomas
Defendant:
Sanders County Sheriff's Department, Laurie Hines and William T. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heinz v. State of Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Heinz
Defendant:
State of Ohio, David Yost, Eric N. Lindsey and others
LaRoe v. Twomey et al
as 3:2024cv30059
Plaintiff:
Pro se Litigant Kelly LaRoe
Defendant:
Paula Twomey, Jefferey Riley, Bureau of Special Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOWREY v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05548
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
LAURIE MOWREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Crawford et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01907
Plaintiff:
Laurie Crawford and Chad Styles
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
