Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Parks v. Smith et al
as 1:2026cv03098
Plaintiff:
Nicholas W. Parks
Defendant:
Lt. Smith, Danal Brooks, Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COTTLE v. LT. HOLLOWOOD et al
as 2:2026cv01413
Plaintiff:
HOWARD COTTLE
Defendant:
LT. HOLLOWOOD, LT. SMITH, DR. CHANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Avina
as 3:2026cv00384
Plaintiff:
Damion Banks
Defendant:
Avina, David Stanesic, Lt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2026cv00136
Plaintiff:
DERONTE VON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, BIBB COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BIBB COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
GIANNONE v. GARCIA et al
as 2:2026cv01710
Defendant:
OFFICER GARCIA, OFFICER WREN, OFFICER COFFER and others
Plaintiff:
CARMINO GIANNONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCoy v. Mendez et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randal B. McCoy
Defendant:
Dr. Mendez, Warden Headly, Warden Surles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
Tasha L. Hayes
Defendant:
Sgt. Murphy, Officer O'Neil, Lt. Parisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Litz v. SCI Camp Hill et al
as 3:2026cv00250
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Craig Litz
Defendant:
SCI Camp Hill, Lt. Smith and PA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Hughes et al
as 3:2025cv02136
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ford
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Harry et al
as 3:2025cv02134
Plaintiff:
Johnny Perez
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Superintendent Kendell, Deputy Superintendent Albert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
