Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Johnson v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Michelle Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nedrick Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI Low
as 24-1257
Plaintiff:
NEDRICK LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI LOW
Johnson v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv01841
Petitioner:
Nedrick Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
LSCI-Allenwood Warden R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Gwinnett County Sheriffs Office/Jail et al
as 1:2023cv05098
Plaintiff:
Emry Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriffs Office/Jail, Gwinnett County Detention Center and Keybo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Johnson
as 23-2977
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON
Johnson v. Reeves
as 1:2023cv04364
Petitioner:
Paul Lamont Johnson
Respondent:
Angela Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaunte Lamont Johnson Sr. v. Tammy L. Campbell
as 5:2023cv01968
Petitioner:
Shaunte Lamont Johnson, Sr.
Respondent:
Ms. Tammy L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Johnson v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv03558
Plaintiff:
LaShawn LaMont Johnson, David Lee Glenn, Bernardo Ford, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Unit Manager Danforth, Unit Manager Tolbert, Unit Manager Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Chaffin et al
as 7:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
Officer L. Chaffin, Franks, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
