Cases 1 - 10 of 1,344
ROE et al v. WARDEN OF SCI GREENE et al
as 2:2024cv00744
Petitioner:
LANA KAY ROE and MARK MARVIN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SCI GREENE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and GREENE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan Dyjak v. Grace Hou, et al
as 24-1816
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
GRACE HOU and LANA MILLER
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Contractors Indemnity Company v. Nuko Paving, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Defendant:
NUKO PAVING, INC., N-LINE CONTRACTING CORP, BLACKSTONE ASPHALT, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WALTERS v. BELLO et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
LANA W. WALTERS and LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
T. BELLO, SALAJA, DEPUTY U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronaldo Elias Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1755
Petitioner:
RONALDO ELIAS DA SILVA, CRISTINA APARECIDA DE LANA SILVA, E. R.D.S and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Patrick v. McGuire et al
as 8:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
Lana Patrick
Defendant:
Manager Lisa McGuire, Sergeant Shireman and Captain Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan Dyjak v. Stacey Horstman, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
STACEY HORSTMAN, JO-AN LYNN and LANA MILLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patrick v. Maertz et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Lana Patrick
Defendant:
Lieutenant Maertz and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
