Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Medley v. Shelton et al
as 2:2018cv00985
Plaintiff:
Anne L Medley
Defendant:
Larry Shelton and State Farm and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robichaud et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03757
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robichaud , Ronald Rogers , Mary Rogers and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robichaud et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01110
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robichaud , Ronald Rogers , Mary Rogers and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01779
Plaintiff:
Martina Shelton and Larry Shelton
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
Justin Morris
Defendant:
Keith L Humphrey , Oklahoma Highway Patrol , Norman City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larry James v. Durham Center
as 10-6207
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY SHELTON JAMES
Respondent - Appellee:
DURHAM CENTER, DURHAM HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION and ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
JAMES v. DURHAM CENTER et al
as 1:2009cv00561
Petitioner:
LARRY SHELTON JAMES
Respondent:
DURHAM CENTER and DURHAM HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry James v. Durham Center
as 08-6288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY SHELTON JAMES
Defendant - Appellee:
DURHAM CENTER, Mental Health Department and CIVIL ADVOCATE, City of Durham Human Relations Commission
James v. Durham Center et al
as 5:2007ct03144
Plaintiff:
Larry Shelton James
Defendant:
Durham Center and Civil Advocate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
