Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Allen v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-2934
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEE ALLEN, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Allen v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Allen
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail and Sheriff Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04452
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LEE ALLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. USA
as 2:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Allen, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE U.S. MARSHALS et al
as 2:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE U.S. MARSHALS, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Icenhour v. Alexander Trucking Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00041
Counter Defendant:
Steve G. Icenhour
Counter Claimant:
Alexander Trucking Company, Inc., BMA, LLC, David Brooks Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shannon v. Allen
as 2:2023cv00922
Plaintiff:
Zina Shannon
Defendant:
Lee Allen
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Albert Allen v. Garland Armstrong, et al
as 23-35087
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALBERT LEE ALLEN
Respondent:
GARLAND ARMSTRONG
Respondent / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JAMES MILBURN
Allen v. Morristown City Police Department
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Allen, Jr
Defendant:
Morristown City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12405
Plaintiff:
JEANELLE LEE ALLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
