Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Basil Lewis, Jr. v. Phil Knight, et al
as 23-5147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BASIL WARREN LEWIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PHIL KNIGHT, Owner, Nike, Inc., MICHAEL JORDAN BRAND and TINKER HATFIELD, Designer
Caplan v. Vargas et al
as 0:2022cv62010
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
YACKELIN LIZ VARGAS an Individual doing business as IN STYLE TIRES, JOHNNIE LEWIS, JR, Yackelin Liz Vargas doing business as IN STYLE TIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pete v. Dunn
as 22-40374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David R. Pete
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert C. Dunn, School Board President, Dennis Wallace Spooner, School Board Member, Malida Hickman and others
Pete v. Dunn et al
as 1:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
David R. Pete
Defendant:
Robert C Dunn, Dennis Wallace Spooner, Malida Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Florio
as 1:2021cv01159
Plaintiff:
Sean Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Florio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. HENDERSON et al
as 1:2021cv01186
Defendant:
JONATHAN HENDERSON and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
MARCUS LEWIS, JR and MARCUS LEWIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. City of Shoreline et al
as 2:2021cv00600
Defendant:
Shasta A Willson, Shoreline Police, City of Shoreline and others
Plaintiff:
Gayle D Hanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mickel E. Lewis Jr. et al v. Kern County et al
as 1:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Briona Lewis, Mickel Erick Lewis Jr. and Oriona Lewis
Defendant:
Kern County and Jason Ayala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
