Cases 71 - 80 of 5,262
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Ofc Luke Jornstead, Ofc Tayor Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Wisner et al
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Matthew Joseph Douglas
Respondent:
Geri Wisner, Matthew J. Hall and Lisa Otipoby-Herbert
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1303 Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Johnson v. Miramontes et al
as 2:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jaime Johnson
Defendant:
Lisa Miramontes and Oneida County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. USA
as 3:2024cv00238
Petitioner:
Lisa Buza Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hill v. USA
as 3:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Lisa Buza Hill
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Sellers v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Donnie Mack Sellers
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen, Kristy Cobban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wellpath Corporation, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, LLC, Dr. Kevin Smith, Summer James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
TERREA CLARK, WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston, Kevon v. Brown, Nicole et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Kevon E. Houston
Defendant:
Nicole Brown and Lisa Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
