Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Callahan v. Giammarco, RN et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ryan Callahan
Defendant:
Bianca Giammarco, RN, David Sasso Jr., APRN, LT. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Meyers v. Vancey et al
as 5:2023ct03346
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
D. Vancey, Jason Farmer, Ms. Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Gino Rotondo, Sr.
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Kimberly Kane, Lori Ventituolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY v. PERRY et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KENNEDY
Defendant:
LT. PERRY, WARDEN MARK BISHOP and DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL SCANEDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Bowers et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Wayne A Thomas
Defendant:
Ernest Bowers, Lt Perry and Capt Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
