Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lumsden v. Nessel
as 2:2026cv13232
Petitioner:
Allan Wilson Lumsden
Respondent:
Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451 Revocation of Naturalization
Provstgaard v. Nye County Nevada et al
as 2:2026cv01951
Plaintiff:
Sheril Willis Provstgaard
Defendant:
Nye County Nevada, Nye County Sheriff Office, Robert W. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lumsden v. Davis et al
as 5:2026cv06112
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lumsden
Defendant:
Fnu Davis, Fnu Michaud, Fnu Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden v. Inzerillo et al
as 5:2026cv06104
Plaintiff:
Ryan John Lumsden
Defendant:
Carl Inzerillo, Corizon Medical, Centurion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RoadsideImports, et al v. United States
as 26-1235
Plaintiff:
ROADSIDEIMPORTS LLC and JOHAN LUMSDEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lumsden v. VEGA-JORDAN
as 6:2026cv00228
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
ISEL VEGA-JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumsden v. Johnson
as 25-40623
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lumsden
Defendant:
Paul Johnson, District Attorney
Arisman et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11465
Plaintiff:
Scott Arisman, Susan Atkins, Mario Avendano and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leary et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11470
Plaintiff:
Donna Leary, Janet Leasure, Robyn Leavitt and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
