Cases 11 - 20 of 422
Jacobson v. O'Bryant et al
as 4:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
O'Bryant and Sgt. Lusk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUSK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09964
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY LUSK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dingler v. Dallas County, Texas
as 23-10679
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant / Appellee:
Dallas County, Texas, Marian Brown, Terrie McVea and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
LUSK v. PELENTI GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
THERON LUSK
Defendant:
PELENTI GROUP, LLC and ANGIE LUNDY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LEE et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
MYONG LEE, MARIOS LEPTOS, ROBIN SIGUR LEPTOS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Lusk v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
as 2:2023cv02148
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lusk
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, Shelby County, Chris Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Kinnard v. Steve Navarro, et al
as 23-15350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. KINNARD
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE NAVARRO, ROGERS TRUCKING, S&S TRUCKING and others
Eastern Associated Coal, LLC v. DOWCP
as 23-1179
Petitioner:
EASTERN ASSOCIATED COAL, LLC and PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JERRY L. LUSK
USA v. Lawrence Lusk
as 23-1203
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE M W LUSK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
