Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dixon et al v. B.E.C Custom Homes and Development, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynne Dixon and James R Dixon
Defendant:
B.E.C Custom Homes and Development, Inc., B.E.C. Custom Homes, Low Country, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Dixon v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Angela Lynn Dixon
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dixon v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00524
Defendant:
Angie Baggett, Jefferson S. Dunn and Charles Tipton
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lynn Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00248
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lynn Dixon and Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv11113
Plaintiff:
MARSHA LYNNE DIXON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forrest et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01855
Plaintiff:
Vickie Forrest , Christine Adams , Katherine Allen and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00466
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Dixon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dixon v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv09094
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Dixon
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. SSA
as 7:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lynn Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dixon v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14193
Plaintiff:
Terrell Lynn Dixon
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
