Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Box v. Rosenstengel et al
as 3:2015cv03232
Plaintiff:
Keith Box
Defendant:
Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jonesboro Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Gary E Johnson
Defendant:
Jonesboro Arkansas, City of, Harold Perrin, John Street and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Keith Box
Defendant:
M Duncan and Walter Frisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donathon Stephenson, et al v. Charles McClelland, et al
as 15-20182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONATHON L. STEPHENSON and CASSANDRA RENEE STEPHENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF CHARLES MCCLELLAND and C. M. DUNCAN
Duncan v. Stryker Orthopaedics
as 1:2015cv01006
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Duncan
Defendant:
Stryker Orthopaedics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv04382
Plaintiff:
Julie M. Duncan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02112
Plaintiff:
Rickie M Duncan
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv16751
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ware Duncan and David M. Duncan
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Duncan et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv31586
Plaintiff:
Bernice M. Duncan and Gary Duncan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
