Cases 11 - 20 of 500
Hill et al v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Hill and Nathan A. Hill
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MOORMAN v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
KIR MOORMAN
Defendant:
M HILL, FUMI and FADOTRIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
M Hill, Fumi and Fadotrim
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Hill v. Kenneth Black
as 23-3929
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK M. HILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN KENNETH BLACK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
HILL v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv21067
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M. HILL
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CFG MEDICAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PC) Johnson v. Hill et al
as 2:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Rick M. Hill, E. Aguilar, J Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2023cv04214
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick M. Hill, Corr. Sergeant E. Aguilar, Corrections Lt. J. Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Platte River Insurance Company v. Yamakawa et al
as 3:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Platte River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nelly Akemi Yamakawa, Michael Stephen Starnes, Rogue Valley Manor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
