Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jones v. Federal Express Corporation
as 5:2026cv02279
Plaintiff:
Leonard B. Jones
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2026cv06108
Plaintiff:
Allen Jones
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03445
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv06110
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jones
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2 Job Discrimination
Jones v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2026cv00262
Plaintiff:
Robert R Jones
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
PDX Biotech Inc. v. Beran et al
as 3:2026cv00738
Plaintiff:
PDX Biotech Inc.
Defendant:
John Beran, Reginald Gresham, Ashley L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Jones v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv07784
Plaintiff:
Craig Jones
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Uhuru v. Gin, et al.
as 26-6019
Plaintiff:
KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant:
JASMIN GIN, Community Resource Manager, GENA JONES, CDCR Director, DAO VANG, Acting Warden at CHCF and others
Joseph Page v. Tennessee Board of Parole, et al
as 26-5812
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DEION PAGE, aka David Jones
Defendant:
TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, FRANK STRADA, Commissioner of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
