Cases 71 - 80 of 102
Huang v. Tine
as 11-806
Plaintiff:
Yun Chiou Cheng, Substitutes, Legal Consumer of Citizen of Massachusetts
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vera W. Huang
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Van Tine, Burns & Levinson & Robin Lynch, Palm Smith, and parties involved and others
Marshall et al v. Kraft et al
as 2:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
Krystal M Marshall
Defendant:
Peggy M Kraft Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Thomas M Marshall v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2011cv01342
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Marshall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marshall et al v. Kimble
as 5:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Marshall and Vicki Lynn Marshall
Defendant:
John Edward Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MARSHALL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52792
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. MARSHALL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Huang v. Tine
as 10-3738
Plaintiff:
Yun Chiou Cheng, Substitutes, Legal Consumer of Citizen of Massachusetts
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vera W. Huang
Defendant - Appellee:
Nancy Van Tine, Burns & Levinson & Robin Lynch, Palm Smith, and parties involved and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARSHALL et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv68546
Plaintiff:
JON M MARSHALL and KAZUE MARSHALL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00019
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeannie M. Marshall
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
