Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Chapman v. Cecil et al
as 2:2026cv12258
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Chapman
Defendant:
Emily Cecil, King and Smock
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Villarreal v. Smock
as 8:2026cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rufino J. Villarreal
Defendant:
Sergeant Timothy Smock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smock v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2025cv01243
Plaintiff:
Latrisha Vintonya Smock
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-3462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nagdy v. Members of (KY. MAS) Stealth Alliance of Malice, Kentucky Malfeasance Association et al
as 3:2025cv00340
Defendant:
Mitch Perry, Christie Foster, Jeffrey D. May and others
Plaintiff:
Salem Nagdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nagdy v. Members of (KY. MAS) Stealth Alliance of Malice, Kentucky Malfeasance Association et al
as 5:2025cv00057
Plaintiff:
Salem Nagdy
Defendant:
Members of (KY. MAS) Stealth Alliance of Malice, Kentucky Malfeasance Association, Mitch Perry, Christie Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THE ESTATE OF RACHEL BLAKE v. CITY OF NORTH VERNON et al
as 4:2025cv00076
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF RACHEL BLAKE
Defendant:
CITY OF NORTH VERNON, NORTH VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JENNINGS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Templin v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2025cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert Templin
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Centurion of Idaho, LLC, MHM Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
