Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McFarlin et al v. The Michaels Organization, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv03041
Plaintiff:
Shawn McFarlin, Gia McFarlin, A.M. and others
Defendant:
The Michaels Organization, LLC, AMC East Communities, LLC and MMS Air Force, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Taylor v. Berlin et al
as 1:2026cv12067
Plaintiff:
George Taylor
Defendant:
Robert B. Berlin, Trevor M.J. Prindle and Mark D. Winistorfer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.J. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv10819
Plaintiff:
M.J.
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anthony Braxton v. M.J. Bayless
as 26-5318
Petitioner:
Anthony Braxton
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless, Warden
Jones v. Franklin County Court et al
as 1:2026cv02598
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Jones
Defendant:
Franklin County Court, Franklin County District Attorney Office, Franklin County P.D. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo v. Griffis et al
as 5:2026cv05769
Plaintiff:
Manases Abrego Castillo
Defendant:
Mike Griffis and M.J. McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jane Doe PNA (M.J.) v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2026cv09392
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe PNA (M.J.)
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier CA - LLC and Rasier LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03399
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Deveaux v. Richardson
as 9:2026cv03781
Plaintiff:
Daryl Wayne Deveaux, Jr
Defendant:
Dep. M.J Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M.J.05 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv09035
Plaintiff:
M.J.05
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
