Cases 1 - 10 of 864
SANDERS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
ULYSSES SANDERS
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, CENTERION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Malloy v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Melissa Malloy
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Malloy v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Rose Malloy
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
Malloy v. Trileaf Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deborah Malloy
Defendant:
Trileaf Corporation and T. Scott Muschany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Fair v. Malloy et al
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Malloy, Capt. Surles, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Nevills v. Okpa et al
as 2:2024cv10485
Plaintiff:
Damion Nevills, Jr.
Defendant:
Okpa, Gillespie, MacLean and others
John Malloy v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00883
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Malloy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
