Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Donald et al
as 1:2014cv23055
Plaintiff:
Marco Rodriguez-Diaz
Defendant:
Calvin Donald and Entertainment One Music U.S. LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
United States of America v. Bonilla (Martinez)
as 14-2759
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Bonilla, AKA A.D.A. Pinto, Yoel Pichardo, AKA Yoel Alberto Pichardo Gonzalez, AKA Yoel Alberto Gonzalez Pichardo, Nassir Mateo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Randall Martinez, AKA Randall, AKA Jose Rodriguez
Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2014cv05633
Plaintiff:
Juan Aguilar, Steven Aguilar, III, Mark Allen and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Contreras et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv22701
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Contreras and Marcos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Zen Bakery of Massachusetts et al
as 4:2013cv13027
Plaintiff:
Marcos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Zen Bakery of Massachusetts , Pin Hsiao & Associates, LLC and Pin Hsiao
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Orta v. USA-TVV
as 3:2013cv00673
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marco Rodriguez Orta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Rodriguez-Dominguez
as 13-1988
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCOS RODRIGUEZ-DOMINGUEZ, a/k/a John Doe 1
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17149
Plaintiff:
Frances Louise Rodriguez and Marcos Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Bonilla (Jose Tejada)
as 13-1611
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Bonilla, AKA A.D.A. Pinto, Yoel Pichardo, AKA Yoel Alberto Pichardo Gonzalez, AKA Yoel Alberto Gonzalez Pichardo, Nassir Mateo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Tejada
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
