Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gore v. Baylous et al
as 3:2025cv00312
Plaintiff:
Spencer W. Gore
Defendant:
Kevin Baylous, Wesley Paul Evans, Timothy Alan Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gore v. Sysco Columbia, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00694
Plaintiff:
Marie Gore
Defendant:
Sysco Columbia, LLC and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Goring v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv02351
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Mary Goring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hjalmar Rodriguez v. Edward Burnside
as 20-11218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ and HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD H. BURNSIDE, MARY GORE, Nurse,GDCP, DAVID BUTTS, Medical Director, GDCP and others
THOMAS v. BURNSIDE et al
as 5:2019cv00015
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER GEORGE BALL, DOCTOR BURNSIDE, NURSE MARY GORE and others
Plaintiff:
CALVIN THOMAS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
George W. Hardy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gore v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv10777
Plaintiff:
Mary Gore
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARFIELD v. LEWIS et al
as 5:2017cv00240
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARFIELD
Defendant:
SHARON LEWIS, HALE E BURNSIDE, MARY GORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
George W Hardy
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Stan Shepard , Bruce Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2017cv00010
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, BRUCE CHATMAN, CELLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
