Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Jones v. Georgia State Police
as 4:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Georgia State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. State Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
State Police Department and Buckhannon Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Miami Police
as 1:2023cv24583
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Miami Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Orange Texas Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Orange Texas Police Department, Jasper Police Department and Texas Highway Patrol, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Louisiana State Police et al
as 2:2023cv07258
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana State Police and New Orleans Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Ohio State Patrol et al
as 1:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Ohio State Patrol, CVG Airport Police Department and Cincinnati Highway Patrol Post 31
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. State Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv03310
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
State Police Department, State of Maryland and Salisbury Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. King
as 23-50850
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Matthew Jones, Ysidro Renteria and William L. Jones Carr
Defendant / Appellant:
Amber M. King, Chris H. Busse and Brandon W. Jones
Jones v. North Carolina State Police et al
as 7:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
North Carolina State Police and Jacksonville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Tampa Bay Police
as 8:2023cv02839
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Tampa Bay Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
