Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Locke v. Connecticut State Police et al
as 3:2026cv00699
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Locke
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Connell v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2026cv00857
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas O'Connell
Defendant:
City of Portland, PPB Officer Joseph Bernard, PPB Officer Nathan Kirby-Glatkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olson v. Thomas et al
as 3:2026cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allan Olson
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas, Officer Daunalt, Cass County Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BCO Management Company, LLC et al v. City of Hagerstown, Maryland et al
as 1:2026cv01356
Plaintiff:
BCO Management Company, LLC, Mark Gatling, Brianna Goffin and others
Defendant:
City of Hagerstown, Maryland, Michael Sabol and Deanna Pelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Darrell McClanahan, III v. James Carrier, et al
as 26-1532
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon McClanahan, III
Defendant:
James Ronald Carrier, Matthew Thomas Weatherman, Lori Jones and others
Ferguson v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00114
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Ferguson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Skeens v. Jefferson et al
as 3:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Skeens and Matthew T Skeens
Defendant:
Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Washington
as 2:2026cv10461
Respondent:
Heidi E Washington
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Harrison [E-filer]
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States v. Matthew McGregor
as 26-1203
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Matthew Thomas McGregor
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00014
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
