Cases 1 - 10 of 12
YATES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08818
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW YATES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Wood v. Chad Eubanks, et al
as 20-3599
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY MATTHEW YATES, in his individual and official capacity, Clark County Sheriff's Department, DEPUTY CHERISH STEIGER, in her individual and official capacity, Clark County Sheriff's Department, DEPUTY JOSEPH JOHNSON, in his individual and official capacity, Clark County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. WOOD
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Wood v. Eubanks et al
as 3:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael A Wood
Defendant:
Chad Eubanks, Mario Troutman, Jr., Cherish Steiger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
US v. Matthew Yate
as 13-7626
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW YATES
US v. Matthew Yate
as 13-6038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW YATES
Yates v. USA
as 3:2012cv02253
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Matthew Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Yates
as 3:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Matthew Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
US v. Matthew Yate
as 11-5004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW YATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
