Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Robinson v. Hutchinson Antivibration Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Hutchinson Antivibration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson v. USA
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robinson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Teneill Wilson, Brandy Stocksdale and Johnathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Robinson v. Basemoor et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Tavon Basemoor, Johnathan Williams, Brandy Stocksdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robinson v. Kansas City Urology Care et al
as 4:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Kansas City Urology Care and Kansas City Urology Care CMP Building One LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Robinson v. State of South Carolina
as 6:2022cv01927
Petitioner:
Otis Maurice Robinson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Holmes, M.D. et al
as 2:2021cv02602
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Daniel Holmes, M.D. and Kansas City Urology Care, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Jeffrey Robinson
as 21-6217
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE ROBINSON
Maurice Robinson v. Bill Stange, et al
as 21-3837
Petitioner / Appellant:
Maurice Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Bill Stange, Warden and Eric Stephen Schmitt, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
Robinson v. Woods et al
as 4:2021cv09447
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
Brendon D. Woods, Diane Bellas, Law Offices of the Alameda County Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
