Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
McKinny v. McDowell et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Defendant:
N McDowell and T Brandmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kashika Speed v. Kevin Thompson
as 24-6236
Plaintiff:
KASHIKA SPEED
Defendant:
KEVIN THOMPSON, Health Services Administrator, FCI McDowell, RN WALTON, and and WARDEN C. MARUKA, FCI McDowell
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10382
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene McDowell, Danny E. McDowell and Danny McDowell
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap and John Doe
Jerido v. Henline et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Ranier Daramus, James Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKNIGHT v. MCDOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCKNIGHT
Defendant:
MCDOWELL and LACOMBE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhummad v. McDowell et al
as 4:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Willie Murry JuQan Demetrices Muhummad
Defendant:
Shalla McDowell, Karma Thorn, Ridgle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
