Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Gallo et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff: Angela Bernhardine Gallo and Lisa Antionietta Lieselotte Gallo
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Carnival Corporation d/b/a Carnival Cruise Lines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Salvemini et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00977
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company, Goulds Pumps LLC, Paramount Global and others
Cross Claimant: Hess Corporation
Plaintiff: Michele Salvemini, Francesco Salvemini, Marco Salvemini and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Weaver et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00116
Plaintiff: William Weaver and Judy Weaver
Defendant: 3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Mendoza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv01911
Defendant: 3M Company, ABB Incorporated, Crown Holdings and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Mendoza, Rick Mendoza and Angelo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mendoza et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2021cv01883
Defendant: 3M Company, ABB Incorporated, Crown Holdings and others
Plaintiff: Victoria Mendoza, Rick Mendoza and Angelo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff: Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant: John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant: Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WARRINGTON et al v. 3M COMPANY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03207
Plaintiff: ROBERT M. WARRINGTON, SR. and JOAN M. WARRINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY,, ABB, INC.,, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross Defendant: HONEYWELL INC., CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and JERGUSON GAGE & VALVE COMPANY
Cross Claimant: THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bantin et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00341
Defendant: Metalclad Insulation LLC, Weir Valves & Controls USA, Inc., FMC Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Gregory R. Bantin and Julie L. Bantin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunbar v. ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04069
Defendant: Howden North America Inc., Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation doing business as Ingalls Shipbuilding formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems formerly known as Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., Velan Valve Corp. and others
Plaintiff: James Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharon Whitehead v. Aurora Pump Company
as 20-1676
Defendant / Appellee: FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, Wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Compnay, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant: UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, STERLING FLUID SYSTEMS USA LLC, f/k/a Peerless Pumps Co., MCNALLY INDUSTRIES, INC., successor-in-interest to NORTHERN FIRE APPARATUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHARON K. WHITEHEAD, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JAMES T. WHITEHEAD, Deceased

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?