Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. MCSO Trinity
as 2:2026cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert Gomez
Defendant:
MCSO Trinity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Montgomery County et al
as 4:2026cv01389
Plaintiff:
Tre Christopher Roberts
Defendant:
Montgomery County, MCSO, Mike Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Viet v. Smith et al
as 5:2025cv00571
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Viet
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Deputy Norman, Deputy Thorsberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallworth et al v. MPD/MCSO et al
as 1:2025cv00293
Plaintiff:
Alana Denise Wyatt Stallworth, Corene Tarvin Wyatt, Seatreion Treshaun Stallworth, Jr and others
Defendant:
MPD/MCSO, The City of Mobile, The State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hicks v. O'Donnell et al
as 3:2025cv01003
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Hicks
Defendant:
Morrisy O'Donnell, Circuit Court of Multnomah County, Isabelle Askanas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chad Farley, et al v. Wayne Potter, et al
as 25-5480
Plaintiff:
CHAD FARLEY and JESSICA FARLEY
Defendant:
WAYNE POTTER, TEDDY BALES, LONNIE LARUE and others
Parker v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2025cv01298
Plaintiff:
Jeramy Parker
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan, Unknown Parties and MCSO Food Factory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yazzie v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2025cv01129
Plaintiff:
Albert Yazzie, Jr.
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan, Unknown Parties and MCSO Food Factory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2025cv01126
Plaintiff:
Francisco Dominguez
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan, Maricopa, County of, MCSO Food Factory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
