Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Medlock v. Nye County, Nevada
as 2:2026cv02785
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Medlock
Defendant:
Nye County, Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medlock v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv02314
Plaintiff:
Brandie Medlock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blackwell v. Medlock et al
as 6:2026cv03402
Plaintiff:
Didi Lynn Blackwell
Defendant:
Victor J Medlock, Matt Frederick and Ghan & Cooper Multifamily, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Torian Medlock v. Adam Douglas
as 26-1573
Petitioner:
TORIAN DEWAYNE MEDLOCK
Respondent:
ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden
Pembelton v. Roden et al
as 3:2026cv01556
Plaintiff:
David Pembelton, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Scotty Roden, Deputy Medlock and Trainee Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Farley et al
as 1:2026cv01209
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
. Farley, . Propp, . Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medlock v. Cates et al
as 3:2026cv04576
Petitioner:
Joshua Medlock
Respondent:
B. Cates and California Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Green v. Judge King et al
as 6:2026cv00142
Plaintiff:
Larry Don Green
Defendant:
Judge King, Matt Price, Dan Medlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDLOCK v. WHITE et al
as 5:2026cv00159
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM AKEEM MEDLOCK
Defendant:
SERGEANT WRIGHT, WARDEN JERMAINE WHITE, WARDEN ANDREW MCFARLANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
