Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bain v. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01811
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
DEDRICK et al v. BANET
as 4:2018cv00183
Plaintiff:
WESLEY D. STOCKTON, TOBIAS JONES, RAYMOND CARR, JR. and others
Defendant:
BANET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Parker et al
as 7:2017cv01820
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Bonner
Defendant:
Todd Parker, Christopher Michael Bain, Keith Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO. v. Alicia Watsonter et al
as 0:2017cv61134
Plaintiff:
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH TRADING CO.
Defendant:
Alicia Watsonter, Antonia Broderick, Arthurvaughan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Paulson v. Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv20094
Plaintiff:
Roxann Paulson
Defendant:
Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc. , Stephane Colleu , John Michael Bain and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOUGH, P.C. v. BAINE et al
as 2:2009cv03000
Plaintiff:
JAFFE HOUGH, P.C.
Defendant:
LAURA BAINE and MICHAEL BAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Baine et al v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 8:2007cv01962
Plaintiff:
Laura Baine, Laura Baine, Michael Baine and others
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated and Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
