Cases 1 - 10 of 561
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. O'Malley
as 24-1980
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Davis v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department and Roseland Community Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jones v. Baltimore City Sheriff's Department, et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
Tyrone A Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE and Michael Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Michael Davis v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 24-10080
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
(SS) Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv03013
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Itson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02092
Plaintiff:
Kardell A. Itson
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Mulroy, Michael Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
