Cases 21 - 30 of 256
BOWEN v. MONNIE et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BOWEN
Defendant:
DEBORAH ANN MONNIE, PATRICK NOSKO, LUKE VOGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ynostrosa v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Ynostrosa
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mackey v. Allison et al
as 5:2021cv09366
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Mackey
Defendant:
K. Allison, Ron Broomfield, Ron Davis Transportation Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulkerson v. Garland
as 4:2021cv03172
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Fulkerson
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Spearman v. Sam Berri Towing et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Reginald E. Spearman and Reginald Edward Spearman
Defendant:
Sam Berri Towing, Cameron Hayne, Jill Woodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00118
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Arizona Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2021cv03054
Defendant:
Katie Hackney, Megan Eggimann, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMMEAU v. MAGNUSSON
as 1:2021cv00055
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Petitioner:
MICHAEL EDWARD COMMEAU
Respondent:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aguilar #038199 v. Coca et al
as 4:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Unknown Ennis, Roxanne Hill, Unknown Larkin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Emberton et al
as 4:2020cv01168
Defendant:
Brick Lewis and Lucas Emberton
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
