Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Valentine v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09899
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane Valentine
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Cipolla-Dennis v. County of Tompkins et al
as 3:2018cv01241
Defendant:
Michael Lane, Martha Robertson, County of Tompkins and others
Plaintiff:
Joanne Cipolla-Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JEAN BAPTISTE v. MATTSON et al
as 2:2018cv13721
Plaintiff:
MYRIAM JEAN BAPTISTE
Defendant:
DARRELL MATSON and MICHAEL LANE MATTSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. GARMAN et al
as 5:2018cv02813
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Respondent:
JOSH SHAPIRO, MARK GARMAN and THE LEHIGH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LANE v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00219
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Michael Lane
as 18-15645
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL ROCKY LANE, AKA Michael Lane
Michael Brewer v. Warden
as 18-11325
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE BREWER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Lane v. Collier et al
as 6:2017cv00566
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Defendant:
Bryan Collier and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00450
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Owen Hinkson
as 17-14142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
OWEN HINKSON, a.k.a.: Michael G. Baxter, Micheal G. Baxter, Owen Baxter, Paul Baxter, Paul Christopher Baxter, Charles Downs, Owen Hickson, Johns Hinkson, Owen G. Hinkson, Owens Hinkson, Michael Lane, Michael Mc Lane, Michael McLane, Michael Payne, Owen H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
