Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Simmons et al v. City of Hurricane et al
as 3:2025cv00345
Plaintiff:
Tearria Simmons, Clinton Simmons, A. B. P. and others
Defendant:
City of Hurricane, Scott Edwards, Chief Michael Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benjamin Carter v. Christopher King
as 25-6181
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FORREST CARTER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KING, Major WRSP, WARDEN KISER, LIEUTENANT LAMBERT and others
Mullins v. Independence Tube Inc et al
as 5:2025cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Mullins
Defendant:
Independence Tube Inc, Enstar Group and Gallagher Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
David Venetucci v. David LeMaster
as 24-5887
Petitioner:
DAVID MICHAEL VENETUCCI, fka David Michael Mullins
Respondent:
DAVID LEMASTER, Warden
MULLINER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15198
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MULLINER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mullins v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00161
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Michael Mullins
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
MULLINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24601
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MULLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arizona Hall v. United States Government, et al
as 22-3396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arizona Hall
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Government, Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., Terry I. Adelman and others
James Aftosmes et al v. Town of Hingham
as 1:2022cv10314
Plaintiff:
James Aftosmes, Cameron Allegra, James Arena and others
Defendant:
Town of Hingham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
