Cases 31 - 40 of 288
Smith v. USA
as 2:2022cv12896
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Norman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Alexis C Norman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Smith and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Smith v. USA
as 3:2022cv00330
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Horelica v. Smith, Warden FMC-Carswell
as 4:2022cv00856
Petitioner:
Charlotte Horelica
Respondent:
Warden FMC Carswell and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv02175
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Christine Brown, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steinmetz v. Smith, et al.
as 6:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
Oscar Steinmetz
Defendant:
Michael Smith, USMCFP Mail Room Staff, A. Deatherage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Neilton Gold v. Logan Edge, et al
as 5:2022cv05185
Plaintiff:
Neilton Marrik Gold
Defendant:
Logan Edge, Michael Smith, Sheriff Tim Helder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02146
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Smith
Respondent:
Warden L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jeremy Martin Haar v. Juan Mattos Jr. et al
as 2:2022cv04827
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Defendant:
Juan Mattos, Jr., David M. Singer, Gracie Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craft v. Fields et al
as 3:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Craft
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Fields and Deputy Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
