Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Taylor v. Whiley et al
as 3:2018cv02046
Defendant:
Quanita Evan, Vance Hind, Mike Adam and others
Plaintiff:
Boliver Stewart Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHIACCHIARINI v. LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA, ET AL.
as 7:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS CHIACCHIARINI
Defendant:
LOWNDES COUNTY GEORGIA, CHRIS PRINE, MIKE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Anthony Hemphill
as 16-12779
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY FLOYD HEMPHILL, a.k.a. BJ Campbell, a.k.a. Mike Adams
Mikely Adam v. Dijon McFarlane et al
as 2:2014cv09214
Plaintiff:
Mikely Adam
Defendant:
Does, Dijon McFarlane and Mick Schultz
Main Street America Assurance Co. v. Deen et al
as 4:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Main Street America Assurance Co.
Defendant:
Bobby Deen, Savannah Kitchen and Bath, LLC, DC4, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Guillermo Rodriguez v. Chris Bentley, et al
as 13-10460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS BENTLEY and MIKE ADAMS
Adams et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01461
Plaintiff:
Unhui Adams and Mike Adams
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe et al v. Mapes et al
as 4:2012cv00498
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Jacob Waters, Johnathon Ruthersford and others
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Rich Hutton and Mike Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roe v. Miller et al
as 4:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerome Roe, Jr
Defendant:
Tom Miller, John Baldwin, Mike Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
