Cases 31 - 40 of 4,676
Randall Williams v. Emily Pelletier
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
RANDALL WILLIAMS, Personal Representative of the Estates of Shanice R. Dantzler-Williams and Miranda R. Dantzler-Williams and BETTY SIMMONS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Stephanie Dantzler
Defendant:
EMILY PELLETIER, CLINTON SACKS, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Buergel et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Miranda Buergel and Mason Buergel
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Gonzalez v. Miranda Cirilo
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Arturo Roberto Gonzalez
Defendant:
Gustavo Alonso Miranda Cirilo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ruiz et al v. Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
as 1:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Genesis Ruiz, Nohemy Arriola, Odilia Arriola and others
Defendant:
Fadmo Health and Homecare Agency Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Zamora Miranda v. FCI Bennettsville's Warden, Joseph
as 9:2024cv01278
Petitioner:
Pablo David Zamora Miranda
Respondent:
FCI Bennettsville's Warden, Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Young S. Lee v. Antonio Miranda et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Young S. Lee
Defendant:
Antonio Miranda, Juan Garica and Does 1 to 10
Freeman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Autumn Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mike Faust, Abraham Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Miranda Banos v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02055
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Miranda Banos
Respondent:
Dean Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
