Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Elijah Clary v. Sergeant Harper
as 16-7047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH SHANE CLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT HARPER
Defendant:
DARLENE WHITE, SHEILA MOORE, MS. HARRIS and others
Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Miles
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Randy White , Steve Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Satans Kidnappers and Aiders et al
as 6:2015cv04966
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Satans Kidnappers and Aiders, Ms Harris, Mr Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiebel v. Harris et al
as 4:2015cv02332
Plaintiff:
Justin Stiebel
Respondent:
Ms. Harris, Ms. Patel and Warden Kroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Clary v. Darlene White
as 15-6479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH SHANE CLARY
Defendant - Appellee:
DARLENE WHITE, SHEILA MOORE, MS. HARRIS and others
Defendant:
SERGEANT HARPER, ROBERT C. LEWIS, CYNTHIA MUNDY and others
Morris v. Stateville/N.R.C/ I.D.O.C et al
as 1:2014cv05178
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Stateville/N.R.C/ I.D.O.C, Ms. Harris and Ms. Lieutenant Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clary v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03204
Plaintiff:
Elijah Shane Clary
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Darlene White, Cynthia Mundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Corpening v. Tracey John
as 12-7465
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING
Respondent - Appellee:
TRACY JOHNS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MS. HARRIS, D. DENSON and others
Warren v. Prince William County et al
as 1:2011cv00832
Plaintiff:
James A. Warren
Defendant:
Prince William County, Superintendent Major Meltis, Lt. Cujoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
