Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Magill v. Depositors Insurance
as 1:2016cv02123
Plaintiff:
Mathew Magill
Defendant:
Depositors Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jessie Frederick v. John MaGill
as 16-7105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSIE FREDERICK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. MAGILL, Director, S.C.D.M.H., in his individual and official capacity, HOLLY SCATURO, Director - S.V.P.T.P, in her individual and official capacity, KIMBERLY POHOLCHUK, Program Coor. S.V.P.T.P., in her individual and official capacity and others
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
Magill v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
as 8:2016cv02013
Plaintiff:
Julie Magill
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Rachel Shaw v. City of Dayton, et al
as 16-3575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RACHEL SHAW, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the Deceased, Kylen English
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DAYTON, OFFICER ALEX MAGILL and JOHN/JANE DOE, Supervisor(s)
Paez et al v. Whaleneck Enterprises et al
as 2:2016cv02673
Plaintiff:
Ramon A. Jimenez Peralta, Rafael Luna, Aquiles V Nunez and others
Defendant:
Lindsay Magill and Whaleneck Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bennett v. APG Media of Ohio, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00353
Plaintiff:
Bennett and Patricia Bennett
Defendant:
APG Media of Ohio, LLC, Sarah Gillespie and Dustin Magill
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Magill v. Wick Towing, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Fredrick S. Magill
Defendant:
Wick Towing, Inc. , Lindley Wick and Kenneth Wick
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 951
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
