Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Wood et al
as 1:2022cv00779
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams and Malcolm Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Mark Wood, Police Jury Rapides Parish, Matt Dauzat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. LONG
as 7:2019cv00122
Defendant:
TRACY LONG
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Williams v. Young
as 1:2019cv00990
Respondent:
Scott Young
Petitioner:
Malcolm Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Adams et al
as 2:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company, Jane Does 1-10, Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Waste Services, Inc.
as 1:2018cv23167
Defendant:
Waste Services, Inc. and B.C.S. Marlene Quintana
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
Williams v. Hamm & Phillips Service Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Williams
Defendant:
Hamm & Phillips Service Company, Inc. and Mark Miedema
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv23800
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Zuercher
as 7:2010cv00068
Petitioner:
Malcolm Williams
Respondent:
J. C. Zuercher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alberti et al v. Gulfstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04794
Plaintiff:
Ernest Alberti, Ernest Alberti, Milda Alberti and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Williams v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00488
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Williams
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Houston County and Houston County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
