Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Dyson Technology Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv15901
Plaintiff:
Dyson Technology Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, -55566, AYA HAH TUT-US and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
JOHNSON v. MATTHEWS
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARCUS MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Marcus Matthews
as 20-6035
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCUS MATTHEWS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Garrett Matthews
as 20-1155
Defendant / Appellant:
GARRETT MARCUS MATTHEWS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MATTHEWS v. MARKER
as 5:2018cv02347
Petitioner:
GARRETT MARCUS MATTHEWS
Respondent:
SEAN MARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ENGLISH v. MATTHEWS et al
as 1:2017cv13583
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ENGLISH
Defendant:
MARCUS MATTHEWS and CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velthuysen #195606 et al v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Velthuysen #195606
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #3 and others
Movant:
Paul Mullholland #484881, Anthony Tarone Hubbard #481211, Paul Turner #485092 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Marcus Matthew Martin v. City of Fontana et al
as 2:2013cv07721
Defendant:
City of Fontana, City of Pomona, Doe Fontana Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Matthew Martin
Matthews #623952 v. Birkett
as 1:2008cv01114
Petitioner:
Marcus Matthews #623952
Respondent:
Thomas Birkett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
