Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Woods v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Woods
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Western Rangeland Conservation Association et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Western Rangeland Conservation Association , Pearson Ranch , Yardley Cattle and others
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Neil Kornze and Juan Palma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Marilyn Woods v. Turner Industries Grp, L.L.C.
as 13-40905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARILYN WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
TURNER INDUSTRIES GROUP, L.L.C.
Woods v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv09348
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Woods
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. Turner Industries Group LLC
as 1:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Woods
Defendant:
Turner Industries, LLC , Turner Industries Group, Inc and Daniel Ashley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wood v. Wachovia Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2009cv00576
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Wood, Marilyn Wood, Marilyn Wood and others
Defendant:
Wachovia Bank, National Association, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Wachovia Bank, National Association and others
Counter Claimant:
Michelle Manning, Michelle Manning, Michelle Manning and others
Counter Defendant:
Marilyn Wood, Marilyn Wood, Marilyn Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Woods v. Angulo
as 3:2009cv01832
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Woods
Defendant:
Gerardo Angulo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
