Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Farghaly et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06660
Plaintiff:
Akram Farghaly and Rania Mohamed
Defendant:
Marion Mitchell, Alvin Soto and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hecking v. NH Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 14-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIRCK HECKING
Defendant - Appellee:
NH CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES, KELLY AYOTTE, KATHERINE J. BARGER and others
Mitchell v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv02384
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Ruby Marion Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hecking v. New Hampshire Conjunctive Parties, et al
as 1:2013cv00338
Defendant:
Kelly Ayotte, Katherine Barger, Tim Beaupre and others
Plaintiff:
Dirck Hecking
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HECKING v. NEW HAMPSHIRE CONJUNCTIVE PARTIES et al
as 1:2013cv00565
Defendant:
ATTY. MS. "PAT", MS. KELLY AYOTTE, MS. KATHRYN BARGER and others
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN DIRCK HECKING
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MITCHELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48510
Plaintiff:
MARION MITCHELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Mitchell v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv02280
Plaintiff:
Shirley Marion Mitchell
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 5:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Lee Marion Mitchell
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles Adminitrator and Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
