Cases 41 - 50 of 455
Zeller v. Northern Biomedical Research, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Jillynne Zeller
Defendant:
Northern Biomedical Research, Inc., Shane Woods, Dean Haan and others
Interested Party:
Robert DeWit
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Johnson v. McRae et al
as 6:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth R McRae, Jr, Temple Police Department and City of Temple, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosberg et al v. Johnson et al
as 8:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg, John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mark Johnson and Robert Evnen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19625
Plaintiff:
MARK JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Temple Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00980
Plaintiff:
Jon Mark Johnson
Defendant:
Temple Police Department and City of Temple, TX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GAMERS PARADISE, LLC. et al
as 2:2022cv05267
Plaintiff:
MARK JOHNSON
Defendant:
GAMERS PARADISE, LLC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Brizuela v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
Felix Brizuela
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
