Cases 1 - 10 of 3,344
Cleveland v. Prendergast et al
as 5:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Alginavon Teriano Cleveland
Defendant:
Michael Prendergast, David Miller, Evan Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. U.S. MARSHALLS
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wheeler v. Marshals Police Department gov et al
as 2:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wheeler
Defendant:
Marshals Police Department gov, CEO Andrew Simon, Fremont Steet Experience LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Dayton v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Dayton
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Nathan Strickland, Frank Piro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marshall v. Walmart Stores East, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Dereck Marshall
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GOMEZ v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
LUIS GOMEZ
Defendant:
L MARSHALL ID # 44402
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
