Cases 21 - 30 of 21,770
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frey et al v. Brunkhorst
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Anne Frey and Marshall Frey
Defendant:
Michelle Brunkhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houser v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Lecresha Renae Houser
Defendant:
Sean B O'Neil, Tracy Anne Pangillinan, Brett Seybold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
(PS) Dayton v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Dayton
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Nathan Strickland, Frank Piro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY v. MONSTERZ, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
MONSTER ENERGY COMPANY
Defendant:
MONSTERZ, LLC and JAYGE L MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Marshall v. Davis, et al.
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Clifford Marshall
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Danny Roe, Sgt. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sappington v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
William C. Sappington
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service, Memphis TN and Benton County, MS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
