Cases 1 - 10 of 23
TAYLOR et al v. SHIVELY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW TAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE C. SHIVELY, ROBERT PIGMAN, MARY MARGARET LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hall v. G.M.S. Management Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
G.M.S. Management Co., Inc., James R. Ogden, Barberton Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis et al v. Southwestern Correctional, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Southwestern Correctional, LLC d/b/a LASALLE CORRECTIONS, LLC and LASALLE SOUTHWEST CORRECTIONS, Steven Foltz, A Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Austin and Mary Margaret Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00590
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Green et al v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv01040
Plaintiff:
Janel Green and Mary Margaret Oliver
Defendant:
Nathan Deal , Steve Stancil and Jamiel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dydzak v. Charles Schwab, et al
as 17-15127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES SCHWAB, MOLLY C. DWYER, ALEX KOZINSKI and others
Darby v. Kagler, et al
as 5:2016cv02426
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Darby
Defendant:
Robert Kagler, Alfred Schrader, Thomas O. Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
