Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Howard v. Bisenius et al
as 1:2023cv12176
Plaintiff:
David Howard
Defendant:
Theresa A Bisenius, Jennifer M Ulwick, Mary Rudolph Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiCrescenzo v. Salem MA Probate & Family Court, et al
as 23-1655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMANDA DICRESCENZO
Defendant / Appellee:
SALEM MA PROBATE & FAMILY COURT and MARY RUDOLPH BLACK
DiCrescenzo v. Salem MA Probate & Family Court et al
as 1:2023cv11268
Plaintiff:
Amanda DiCrescenzo
Defendant:
Salem MA Probate & Family Court and Mary Rudolph Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rudolph v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06640
Plaintiff:
Mary Rudolph
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rudolph v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2012cv11308
Plaintiff:
Teresa Marie Rudolph
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rudolph v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00909
Plaintiff:
Mary Rudolph
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUDOLPH v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv79985
Plaintiff:
MARY RUDOLPH
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION, A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Pro Division, Inc. et al v. Eagle Bank et al
as 7:2008cv08897
Plaintiff:
Pro Division, Inc. and Wayne S. Demilia
Defendant:
Eagle Bank, Eagle Bancorp, Inc., Washington D.C. Bowl Committee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
