Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gwendolyn Perryman v. Mary Teague, et al
as 24-11936
Defendant:
MARY TEAGUE and BRENT HALL
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN A. PERRYMAN
Perryman v. Butler County Commission, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn A. Perryman
Defendant:
Butler County Commission, Alabama, Stephen Lofton, Mary Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. Butler County Commission, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Melissa McCullough
Defendant:
Butler County Commission, Alabama, Danny Bond, Stephen Lofton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-50202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bethel v. Harden et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00222
Plaintiff:
Garron Van Bethel and Gaaron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Kenny Harden, Serena Smith, Sabrina Stone Brundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Teague v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
Mary Teague
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv02086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Teague et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv07434
Plaintiff:
Mary Teague and Thomas Teague
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Desarrollo e Investigacion Medica Aragonesa, S.L. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teague et al v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
Glen Teague and Marie Teague
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
